Striking-off order
A striking-off order is the most serious sanction. It means removing the professional’s name from the Register, which prevents them from working as a registered nurse, midwife or nursing associate.
This sanction is likely to be appropriate if the professional’s actions are fundamentally incompatible with being a registered professional. Before imposing this sanction, the Committee should consider:
- Do the charges found proved raise fundamental questions about their professionalism?
- Can public confidence in the profession be maintained if the professional is not removed from the Register?
- Is there any amount of insight and reflection which could keep people receiving care and members of the public safe, maintain public confidence in the profession, and uphold professional standards?
- Is there a realistic prospect that, after suspension, the professional will have gained insight and strengthened their practice such that the risk they pose will have reduced?
The Committee should refer to our guidance on sanctions for the highest risk cases. This highlights how the Committee should approach some types of cases where strike-off is most likely to be appropriate. This is because it may not be possible for the professional to put things right, or they will most seriously affect the public's trust and confidence in the professions.
The types of case that are most likely to result in a striking-off order are:
- Cases involving dishonesty or a breach of the professional duty of candour
- Sexual misconduct
- Abuse of children or vulnerable adults
- Deliberately causing harm to people receiving care, or putting them at serious risk of harm
- Failing to engage with the fitness to practise process.
This is not an exhaustive list.
These cases may arise under a number of grounds of impairment, for example misconduct, conviction or caution, or a finding of another regulator.
When a striking-off order cannot be used
A striking-off order can’t be used if the professional’s fitness to practise is impaired due to:
- their health
- lack of competence
- not having the necessary knowledge of English
until they have been on either a suspension order or a conditions of practice order for a continuous period of two years.
The two-year period can be made up of a combination of suspensions and conditions. However there must have been a continuous period during which the professional’s practice has been subject to restriction under a final order. If there is a gap in which their practice was unrestricted then a striking-off order cannot be used.
Example:
A registered nurse was previously subject to a suspension order for a year, but returned to unrestricted practice following a review. Six months later, as a result of an unrelated Fitness to Practise process, the nurse is then subject to conditions of practice for a year on the basis that their fitness to practise is impaired on the basis of their health. At a review hearing, the nurse cannot be removed from the Register because there has not been a continuous two-year period of sanction.
Restoration
A professional who has been struck-off may not apply for restoration for five years after the order. Our guidance on restoration explains how the Committee approaches these applications.
-
Print
-
Download
-
Email Page
- Last Updated: 28/01/2026
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- When we use interim orders
- Our investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Clinical advice
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- What we mean by vulnerability
- Early engagement
- Screening
- Interim Orders
-
Investigations
- Gathering information
- How we investigate health concerns about nurses, midwives and nursing associates
- Directions to take a language assessment
- Investigating what caused the death or serious harm of a patient
- Investigating what caused the death or serious harm of a patient
- Independent experts
- Investigating at the same time as other organisations
- Case Examiners
- Preparing for the FtP Committee
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Case conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
- FtP Committee decision making
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review of a substantive order
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration