At the end of the investigation
In this guide
At the end of the investigation
Back to topWe must provide to the case examiners all the evidence for their decision that we’ve gathered in our investigation. We must do this for every investigation.
The case examiners cannot reach a decision that there is a case to answer or issue advice or a warning unless we have sent any information or documents obtained during the investigation to the professional.1 With this information, we must send the professional an invitation to make further representations to us and respond to the information shared.2 This invitation must give the nurse, midwife or nursing associate 28 days to respond.3 If the professional is not able to respond in this time, we may be able to give them additional time.4 Reasons for allowing additional time might include, among others, where the information we have sent is particularly long or complex, the professional has reasonable adjustments so that they need longer with the documents, or there are extenuating personal circumstances, such as serious illness or a family emergency.
If the case examiners have already reached a view that no further action is necessary as a result of their early engagement with the case, it is not necessary for us to invite the professional to consider the information and provide a response. This is because the impact of inviting the professional to submit a response would be to extend unnecessarily the time until the case is concluded.
In this situation, the case examiners should note in their decision that the professional did not have the opportunity to comment on the outcome of the investigation. This is because the case examiners’ decision could be relied on by us in the future, so the position of the professional should be captured accurately.
Whatever the case examiners’ decision, the professional will be informed of the outcome. For example, if the case examiners decide to close the matter with no further action, we will communicate this to the professional. This would be the case even if the professional had not been asked to make further representations, for the reasons set out above.
1. Rule 6C(1A)(a) of the FtP Rules
2. Rule 6C(1A)(b) of the FtP Rules
3. Rule 6C(1A)(b) of the FtP Rules
4. Rule 6C(1B) of the FtP Rules
-
Print
-
Download
-
Email Page
- Last Updated: 01/10/2026
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
Related guides
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- When we use interim orders
- Our investigations
- Examining cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Clinical advice
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Early engagement and a professional’s evidence
- What we mean by vulnerability
- Screening
- Interim Orders
-
Investigations
- Gathering information
- How we investigate health concerns about nurses, midwives and nursing associates
- Directions to take a language assessment
- Causation: the difference between risking harm and causing harm
- Independent experts
- Investigating at the same time as other organisations
- At the end of the investigation
- Case Examiners
- Preparing for the FtP Committee
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Case conferences
- Case management directions
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
- FtP Committee decision making
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review of a substantive order
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration