In this guide
- What are undertakings?
- When we would recommend undertakings
- What we consider before recommending undertakings
- Deciding which undertakings to recommend
- Agreeing the undertakings
- How we monitor undertakings
- Lifting the undertakings
- Varying the undertakings
- Addressing breaches of undertakings
- Restating or varying the undertakings
- Revoking the undertakings and referring the case to the Fitness to Practise Committee
What are undertakings?Back to top
Undertakings are measures which can be put in place to address problems in the nurse or midwife's practice that pose a current risk to patients.
Case examiners agree these with the nurse and midwife to allow them to work on the areas of their clinical practice which cause concern.
This lets them demonstrate that there is no longer a need to restrict their practice, because they no longer present any risk to patients.
Undertakings are intended to be a pathway back to safe practice, so they need the nurse or midwife to take positive steps within clear time limits.
They’re different to conditions of practice orders, which are ordered by the Fitness to Practise Committee, as they are agreed with the nurse or midwife first. Conditions of practice orders also run for fixed time periods, and there has to be a review hearing, usually towards the end of their duration. With undertakings, case examiners review the nurse or midwife’s progress and there’s no need for a hearing to do the review.
When we would recommend undertakingsBack to top
Case examiners may recommend undertakings when they find a case to answer and the nurse or midwife acknowledges that one or more areas of their practice (including their health) presents a risk to patients in their care.
Undertakings may be recommended in cases which, if they were being considered at a hearing, would involve:
- lack of competence
- misconduct (particularly where the conduct related to clinical practice)
- not having the necessary knowledge of English
Undertakings are less likely to address the regulatory concern in cases involving:
- misconduct not involving clinical practice
- criminal convictions or cautions
- determinations of impaired fitness to practise by another health or social care regulator.
What we consider before recommending undertakingsBack to top
Before case examiners recommend undertakings, they will have decided that:
- our investigation fully explored the regulatory concern
- the regulatory concern is not so serious that permanent removal from the register is likely to be necessary
- the nurse or midwife agrees that the incidents we have concerns about took place
- the nurse or midwife accepts that there’s a need for measures to address areas of their practice which cause patient risk
- it’s possible to identify a list of proportionate, measurable and workable requirements, and that these will be sufficient to protect patients, judged against the background of the particular case - if such measures cannot be identified then more restrictive outcomes are likely to be required, which means the case should be referred to the Fitness to Practise Committee.
Deciding which undertakings to recommendBack to top
When recommending undertakings, case examiners will consider which measures would be sufficient to protect the public and provide a structured approach towards the nurse or midwife returning to safe practice. They’ll look at the undertakings bank to assist them with this.
Measures may need to be tailored to take account of particular features of the case, or of the setting in which the nurse or midwife practises.
Undertakings will normally include both:
- ‘restrictive’ measures, which prevent a nurse or midwife from undertaking a particular activity, and
- ‘rehabilitative’ steps, which require a nurse or midwife to do something in order to remedy the outstanding regulatory concern.
Standard requirements to inform employers, and other parties, that the nurse or midwife is subject to undertakings are a ‘restrictive’ measure.
The measures included in the undertakings should focus on addressing the specific concerns about the nurse or midwife’s practice. Case examiners will consider the guidance on remediation in identifying what steps are required to address the particular concerns in the case they are considering.
Both the case examiners and the nurse or midwife need to have a clear understanding of what the nurse or midwife needs to do in order to comply with the undertakings, and this must be clearly set out. The undertakings must set out how the nurse or midwife should demonstrate that they have observed any duties which the undertakings impose.
Because undertakings are a pathway back to safe practice, it is important that any ‘rehabilitative’ measures the nurse or midwife is required to complete have clear time limits so everyone knows when the nurse or midwife will be expected to have taken the steps.
‘Restrictive’ measures, such as those which prevent a nurse or midwife from carrying out particular tasks, will not have fixed dates by which they will automatically expire. This is because the purpose of them is to prevent risks from occurring, so they must be in place until case examiners are satisfied, once the nurse or midwife has provided relevant evidence, that they are no longer needed to protect members of the public.
Agreeing the undertakingsBack to top
Case examiners will send the recommended undertakings to the nurse or midwife to consider. They’ll have 28 days to tell us if they agree to follow the recommended undertakings. If the nurse or midwife does not confirm that they agree the undertakings by the date provided, then the concerns will be referred for a hearing.
Case examiners can use their discretion to decide if the 28 day period for agreeing undertakings needs to be extended.
When deciding if the period should be extended, they’ll consider the nature of the reason why more time is needed, and whether the request for more time was made within the original time period.
We recognise that the nurse or midwife may need to suggest amendments to the recommended undertaking because they have concerns about whether the undertakings are workable. Case examiners will consider whether these amendments can be made if they’re sure the undertakings are sufficient to address the concerns in the case and protect patients, while giving the nurse or midwife the opportunity to put the concerns right.
At the end of our investigation we send the nurse or midwife our statement of regulatory concern along with the material we gathered in our investigation. The nurse or midwife will be able to comment on that statement when they respond to the investigation material. It’s only once the time period for a response has passed that the case examiners will consider whether there is a case to answer (and if there is, whether to recommend undertakings). We publish the statement of regulatory concern as part of the undertakings in most cases. If the concern is about the nurse or midwife's health, or is otherwise sensitive, we do not publish details of the concern and we do not publish the undertakings if they could identify a health condition or sensitive information.
We can use undertakings to resolve cases at any stage before the start of a Fitness to Practise Committee hearing. However, if the case examiners recommended undertakings, and the nurse or midwife didn’t respond in 28 days, or rejected them, we’d only use our discretion to do this in very limited circumstances.
How we monitor undertakingsBack to top
We monitor the progress of nurses and midwives who have agreed undertakings with us in a proactive way.
Our monitoring and compliance team will keep in regular contact with the nurse or midwife and, where they need to, will review the nurse or midwife's progress against the undertakings on an ongoing basis. The team considers any material that we receive about the case, and looks at whether:
- the undertakings may need to be varied,
- the undertakings can be lifted, or
- the case may need to be sent to the Fitness to Practise Committee, because it appears that the nurse or midwife is not observing the undertakings.
If we receive new information which is relevant to the undertakings, the team will refer the case to case examiners. The case examiners will consider if one of the outcomes outlined above is necessary.
Lifting the undertakingsBack to top
If the case examiners decide that the nurse or midwife has completed the steps identified in their undertakings and that no other steps are needed to deal with the risks that come from the original regulatory concerns, they’ll direct that the undertakings should be lifted and the case will be closed.
Case examiners will only recommend further steps if they’re needed to deal with the underlying concerns about the nurse or midwife’s fitness to practise. For example, this might be needed if a nurse or midwife has completed a period of practice under direct supervision and needs to show that they are safe to practise by operating under indirect supervision.
Varying the undertakingsBack to top
We may need to vary the agreed undertakings for a number of reasons.
There may be changes that are necessary so the undertakings can remain workable. For example, if there are changes in the setting in which the nurse or midwife practises, such as a change in management or supervision arrangements, which mean that the current undertakings can no longer be observed.
We may also vary undertakings in order to deal with minor or technical breaches of undertakings. This is likely to be appropriate where case examiners are satisfied that the nurse or midwife still has insight into the need for regulatory restrictions but, for example, requests further time to complete one or more of the steps identified. In these type of cases, the undertakings could be varied by extending the time periods.
Variations may also be used where the nurse or midwife has completed the steps that were initially included in their undertakings, but the case examiners believe that some further progress is required before they are able to return to safe practice without restriction. An example of this might be where the nurse or midwife is required to carry out retraining, such as a preceptorship, and there are still concerns about an area of their clinical practice which is related to the original regulatory concern when this is completed.
Where the case examiners recommend variations to undertakings, but the nurse or midwife does not agree to these variations, the case will be reviewed by the Registrar. The Registrar will also review the case examiners’ decision to recommend the original undertakings.
If the Registrar decides that a new case to answer decision is needed, they will have all of the available outcomes that were originally open to the case examiners.
Addressing breaches of undertakingsBack to top
Where the case examiners receive information from the monitoring and compliance team that suggests that the nurse or midwife is in breach of the agreed undertakings, they can:
- restate the requirements of the undertakings to the nurse or midwife
- write to the nurse or midwife, proposing varied undertakings
- revoke the undertakings and refer the original allegation to the Fitness to Practise Committee.
Restating or varying the undertakingsBack to top
A minor breach of the undertakings might be where there has been late compliance with one or more of the requirements, where the nurse or midwife has made genuine and substantial attempts to complete the requirements in time, and they have insight into the need for restrictions to be in place.
In circumstances such as these, and other minor breaches, the case examiners may write to the nurse or midwife restating the undertakings, that they remain in effect, and must be complied with.
Alternatively, if a nurse or midwife asks for a variation to the undertakings to allow further time to complete one or more of the steps identified, case examiners can approve the variation if this is a proportionate way of dealing with the breach.
Revoking the undertakings and referring the case to the Fitness to Practise CommitteeBack to top
Our rules give case examiners the power to revoke undertakings where it appears that the nurse or midwife has not observed them. In those circumstances we would expect case examiners to refer the case to the Fitness to Practise Committee for a hearing.
It would be most appropriate to refer the allegation to the Fitness to Practise Committee if the alleged failure to observe undertakings was deliberate, repeated, or created a significant risk to patient safety.
There would need to be exceptional circumstances for the case examiners to revoke the undertakings without sending the case onto the Fitness to Practise Committee. This is because the undertakings were there to address a current risk to patient safety, so patients would be put at risk if the undertakings were removed without further consideration at how best to address the concerns.
We may need to refer some cases to the Fitness to Practise Committee even though the nurse or midwife still has insight into any failings in their practice. This can happen if they haven’t been able to complete the steps necessary to show they’ve put the concerns right, having been given repeated chances or extensions of time to do this. If this happens, there will often be no realistic possibility that the nurse or midwife will be able to meet the requirements in the undertakings.
Where cases are referred to the Fitness to Practise Committee the charges would include the original regulatory concern and the breach of the undertakings. We’ll put forward the evidence to show that the nurse or midwife had accepted our regulatory concerns and we will usually use evidence of them breaching the undertakings to show the Committee that they are not currently fit to practise.
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.