Gathering further evidence after the investigation
There are times when we may decide we need further evidence before the case will be ready for a final hearing. Our guidance on Our culture of curiosity sets out our approach to investigating concerns.
There are a number of reasons for this:
- We have received new information that we need to investigate fully.
- We need further information that clarifies or expands on earlier evidence we obtained.
- A witness who wasn’t previously available is now able to give us a witness statement about the events.
We have a duty1 to make sure that we place sufficient evidence before the Fitness to Practise Committee so that it can understand what is alleged to have gone wrong in the nurse, midwife, or nursing associate’s practice. If we need to gather further evidence to allow us to fulfil this duty we will do so.
We also have a responsibility to be proportionate in our charging. This means that we should have enough evidence properly to reflect the seriousness of the conduct alleged; reflect the period of time over which the alleged conduct has occurred; and, if the charges are found proved, allow the committee to deal appropriately with issues of impairment and sanction. If we can do this with the evidence we already have then we won’t need to gather further evidence because it won’t be necessary or proportionate to do so.
- We have reason to think that there is evidence which was not available to the Case Examiners which shows that the nurse, midwife or nursing associate can now practise safely, kindly and effectively.
Our overarching objective is to protect the public and our fitness to practise principles explain that this isn’t about punishing people for past events. Where we consider that the best way to resolve a case may be for a nurse, midwife or nursing associate to return to unrestricted practice, we may ask the practitioner to provide us with up-to-date evidence, which was not available to the Case Examiners, to demonstrate that they are practising safely, kindly and effectively (for example, references, training records, etc). So long as the allegation against them isn’t fundamentally incompatible with remaining on the register, we may then ask a panel to decide if this new information means there is still a realistic prospect of current impairment. We call this process ‘offering no evidence’ and have separate guidance on when we may do this.
- If a nurse, midwife or nursing associate is being investigated due to concerns that their health affects their fitness to practise.
We may need to get up-to-date tests or medical reports. We may need these even if we already have a report, because the panel may need to know if anything has changed since the first report.
If we do have to get further information in order to prepare the case properly, we’ll give the nurse, midwife or nursing associate a copy of any new evidence we’ve obtained and tell them if we plan to put this evidence in front of the Fitness to Practise Committee.
If the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has asked us to try and obtain further information to assist their case, we will consider this as part of our duties under disclosure.
1 See PSA v NMC & Jozi [2015] EWHC 764 (admin)
-
Print
-
Download
-
Email Page
- Last Updated: 03/03/2025
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- When we use interim orders
- Our investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Clinical advice
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- What we mean by vulnerability
- Early engagement
- Screening
- Interim Orders
-
Investigations
- Gathering information
- How we investigate health concerns about nurses, midwives and nursing associates
- Directions to take a language assessment
- Investigating what caused the death or serious harm of a patient
- Investigating what caused the death or serious harm of a patient
- Independent experts
- Investigating at the same time as other organisations
- Case Examiners
- Preparing for the FtP Committee
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Case conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
- FtP Committee decision making
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review of a substantive order
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration