Clinical advice
Why we use clinical advice
Back to topClinical advisers are experienced nurses and midwives with a wide range of clinical knowledge who provide broad, general advice to assist decision makers in understanding the clinical context in which something happened and any clinical risks posed, whether by the professional themselves, or wider systemic issues. Clinical advisers provide guidance on clinical issues raised by a particular concern within the boundaries of their professional expertise. Clinical advisors may also suggest further enquiries such as determining what policies, guidance or training were in place at the time. Their input is one of several sources considered by decision makers when evaluating whether regulatory action is necessary to protect the public.
Clinical advice is based on the information provided in the referral, professional knowledge, experience and relevant contemporaneous guidance and policies related to the referral. Where required clinical advisers can also support the appropriate teams to identify the correctly qualified expert witness in a case (see our guidance on expert witnesses). This is typically when we need very specific clinical expertise.
When clinical advice shouldn’t be used
Back to top- Clinical advice shouldn’t replace independent expert advice.
- Clinical advice isn’t admissible evidence. It doesn’t express any view regarding the strength of any evidence or make a decision that a decision maker should make.
- Clinical advice shouldn’t assist in resolving disputes; it is solely to help in assessing the clinical issues raised in a referral.
- Clinical advisers can’t be asked to make a decision on next steps in a case; that is for the relevant decision-maker to make.
-
Print
-
Download
-
Email Page
- Last Updated: 25/03/2026
Want to download and print whole sections of this FtP library? Visit the downloads page.
Related guides
FtP library
-
Understanding Fitness to Practise
- Aims and principles for fitness to practise
- Allegations we consider
- When we use interim orders
- Our investigations
- Examining cases
- How we manage cases
- Meetings and hearings
- Resolving cases by agreement
- What sanctions are and when we might use them
-
Taking account of context
- Taking account of context - overview
- 1: We’ll approach cases on the basis that most people referred to us are normally safe
- 2: We’ll seek to build an accurate picture about the nurse, midwife or nursing associate’s practising history
- 3: We’ll always carefully consider evidence of discrimination, victimisation, bullying or harassment
- 4: Where risks are caused by system and process failures, we’ll concentrate on the action we can take to help resolve the underlying issues
- 5: In cases where a nurse, midwife or nursing associate was required to use their professional judgement we’ll respond proportionately
- 6: Evidence of steps the nurse, midwife or nursing associate has taken to address serious concerns caused by a gap in knowledge or training or personal context factors
- 7: We’ll always look into whether group norms or culture influenced an individual’s behaviour before taking action
- 8: Where an incident has occurred because of cultural problems, we’ll concentrate on taking action to minimise the risk of the same thing happening again
- What context factors we think are important to know about when considering a case
- Our culture of curiosity
- Clinical advice
- Decisions of the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) and Disclosure Scotland
- Insight and strengthened practice
- Early engagement
- Screening
- Interim Orders
- Investigations
- Case Examiners
- Preparing for the FtP Committee
-
Case management
- Hearing fitness to practise allegations together
- Case conferences
- Preliminary meetings
- Considering cases at meetings and hearings
- Removal by Agreement
- Cancelling hearings
- Constitution of panels
- Proceeding with hearings when the nurse, midwife or nursing associate is absent
- Case management during hearings
- Hearings in private and in public
- When we postpone or adjourn hearings
- Supporting people to give evidence in hearings
- FtP Committee decision making
- Sanctions
-
Reviews
- Reviewing case examiner decisions
-
Substantive order reviews
- Substantive order reviews - overview
- Standard reviews of substantive orders before they expire
- Early review of a substantive order
- Exceptional cases: changing orders with immediate effect at a standard review
- Review of striking-off orders
- New allegations
- Reviewing orders when there may have been a breach
- Reviews where an interim order is in place
- Removal from the register when there is a substantive order in place
- Appeals and restoration