Constitution of panels
Last Updated 21/12/2017Print
In this guide
Panels of our Fitness to Practise Committee or Investigating Committee making any decisions at hearings or meetings will be made up of three people.
One of the three people must be a nurse or midwife, and one of them must be a member of the public who is not a registered nurse or midwife (that is, a lay person). The Chair of the panel can be a nurse or midwife or lay.1
If the hearing is about a midwife, there will be a midwife on the panel. If the hearing is about a nurse, there will be a nurse on the panel.2 There are two exceptions to this: for interim orders, and some substantive order reviews.
Panel constitution for interim ordersBack to top
If the panel has been asked to consider making or reviewing an interim order, one of the members of the panel must be a registered nurse or midwife. However, we do not require that the nurse or midwife on the panel must be from same part of the register as the person whose fitness to practise or entry in the register we are investigating.3
Panel constitution for particular substantive order reviewsBack to top
At reviews of substantive orders, one of the members of the panel must be a registered nurse or midwife. However, we do not require the nurse or midwife to be from the same part as the register as the person whose sanction the panel is reviewing, if the following conditions are met:
- the panel decided that the nurse or midwife’s fitness to practise was impaired because of their of health or lack of competence at the initial substantive hearing
- the nurse or midwife has been continuously subject to a suspension order, a conditions of practice order, or a combination of periods of suspension and conditions, for at least two years, and
- the nurse or midwife has never engaged with our proceedings, has told us they no longer want to engage in our proceedings, or have stated that they wish to be removed from the register.4
What happens if a panel member cannot continue to sit?Back to top
Sometimes a panel member becomes unavailable or no longer eligible5 to sit on our panel during the course of a hearing.
If this happens, rather than start the hearing again, we are able to substitute a new panel member for the person who is no longer able to sit.6 The panel will still need to be made up of the same kinds of members identified above.
When we decide that substituting a new panel member is the best way to proceed, we will explain to the nurse or midwife, in advance of the hearing continuing with the new panel member, why we think it is in the interests of justice to do this. We will give the nurse or midwife the chance to tell us whether they agree with a new panel member being substituted.
After we have substituted a new panel member for someone who has become unavailable or is no longer eligible the hearing can resume. At this point, the panel members are able to decide for themselves whether:
- the substitution is for a proper purpose
- proper procedures have been followed
- it is in the interests of justice for the substituted panel member to participate.7
If the panel members decide to carry out this assessment, they should consider any previous correspondence between us and the nurse and midwife, and any representations the parties make.8
1 Rule 6(10) of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (Practice Committees) (Constitution) Rules 2008.
2 Our Council adopted this requirement to take effect from April 2011.
3 Our Council agreed the exception for interim orders in February 2013
4 The Director of Fitness to Practise issued this guidance on behalf of Council in December 2014.
5 This could include a panel member who is a lay person becoming registered as a nurse or midwife during the hearing, or the registration of a member who is a nurse or midwife lapsing during the hearing.
6 R (on the application of Michalak) v General Medical Council  EWHC 2307 (Admin)
7 Michalak, cited above, paragraph 12.
8 Previous correspondence will be particularly relevant to the question of proper procedures, which are not set out in our legislation. A key consideration is whether the nurse or midwife has been given a fair chance to have their views taken into account.